<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Isaac Newton, Daniel&#8217;s 70 Weeks &amp; the Six Day War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logosapologia.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638</link>
	<description>Defending the Faith, Evangelizing the Eschaton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: liam</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[issac newton was not a christian as he did not belive in the divinity of Jesus christ. I think he is more of an Arian which was defeated in the early church. Although revived through the free masons who are in christian terms like Issac newton Anti-christs. So i think using Newton aqs a source one has to take inthese facts that he is a wicked heritic and his doctrines are infact dangerous although i agree he was a mathematical genius. but he is an anti-christ so the fact he may have been a iconoclast could prove this thesis is the wrong thesis as the ark of the covenant had images of angels on it.  Newton therefore does not have the holy spirit for his guide but the spirit of anti-christ satan the devil(lucifer). many of these alchemists were witches or wizards who worshiped lucifer.
there is evidence Newton was an anti-christ and also its not far to jump to the conclusion he was a luciferian as he was a mason a secret society which is the eternal enemy of the church and jesus christ himself. he may also have been a secret kabalist jew which means he is the worst kind of satanist and his work should be cast in the fire as Newton himself may very well have been into the fires of hell]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>issac newton was not a christian as he did not belive in the divinity of Jesus christ. I think he is more of an Arian which was defeated in the early church. Although revived through the free masons who are in christian terms like Issac newton Anti-christs. So i think using Newton aqs a source one has to take inthese facts that he is a wicked heritic and his doctrines are infact dangerous although i agree he was a mathematical genius. but he is an anti-christ so the fact he may have been a iconoclast could prove this thesis is the wrong thesis as the ark of the covenant had images of angels on it.  Newton therefore does not have the holy spirit for his guide but the spirit of anti-christ satan the devil(lucifer). many of these alchemists were witches or wizards who worshiped lucifer.<br />
there is evidence Newton was an anti-christ and also its not far to jump to the conclusion he was a luciferian as he was a mason a secret society which is the eternal enemy of the church and jesus christ himself. he may also have been a secret kabalist jew which means he is the worst kind of satanist and his work should be cast in the fire as Newton himself may very well have been into the fires of hell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[philip brewer newton clearly interprets two commands given in the weeks prophecy; from the command to return and rebuild ; 7 weeks and 62 weeks. all we are looking for at the second command is a return of jerusalem to its old inhabitants; newton plainly says this and june 7, 1967 clearly meets the criteria. this is no longer interpretation, newton has brought this into the arena of rational discourse and empirical observation. there is no possible rational reason for me to entertain your interpretation as remotely possible since it is now at odds with an interpretation that is observed as being accurate beyond rational dispute.

if you would have caught me before this i would be saying, &quot;yeah, sure; your interpretation of the weeks prophecy is entirely possible; and so is his, and hers&quot; but now that has become &quot;newton is rationally correct therefore everyone else is rationally wrong. it&#039;s nothing personal to anyone- it&#039;s just the way it is. isaac newton is to blame for this; not me. that is to say, since newton&#039;s interpretation is demonstrating itself to be extremely likely, that means all opposing theories become extremely unlikely.

you said &quot;Do not get the Second Coming as King of Kings and the taking of his Bride confused, they are separate events&quot; but this is cannot possibly be true since the apostle clearly states both things occur at an event called &quot;the parousia of the Lord&quot;- 1thess4:15-17; 2thess2:8. so, speaking in context of newton&#039;s predictions i can now safely say that the catching up will occur at the sept 23, 2015 point. which blows my mind even right now but the information cannot be rationally denied so my hand is forced.

i have to side note here that newton&#039;s work had time-constrained the prophetic timeline so we are going to be seeing the king of confusion launching his attack with all his host on tevet 10 and that is really REALLY looking like what all this mayan 2012 hype is intended to do- herald the parousia of the son of perdition. believe me when i tell you he&#039;s coming, and he is going to wipe the church off the face of the earth- only a remnant of christians will escape the spiritual assault and remain faithful to the true King of Israel. i see clearly now that the means of escape is knowledge of the times as prophetic appointments. everyone is being taught to expect a horrible physical calamity but it is all a horrible spiritual calamity- and the christians are in the crosshairs. do not let anyone deceive you by any means: if he doesn&#039;t come on tishri 10 he is NOT our Rock.

Eph 6:11-13 read it; learn it; live it. 1Pet 4:12]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>philip brewer newton clearly interprets two commands given in the weeks prophecy; from the command to return and rebuild ; 7 weeks and 62 weeks. all we are looking for at the second command is a return of jerusalem to its old inhabitants; newton plainly says this and june 7, 1967 clearly meets the criteria. this is no longer interpretation, newton has brought this into the arena of rational discourse and empirical observation. there is no possible rational reason for me to entertain your interpretation as remotely possible since it is now at odds with an interpretation that is observed as being accurate beyond rational dispute.</p>
<p>if you would have caught me before this i would be saying, &#8220;yeah, sure; your interpretation of the weeks prophecy is entirely possible; and so is his, and hers&#8221; but now that has become &#8220;newton is rationally correct therefore everyone else is rationally wrong. it&#8217;s nothing personal to anyone- it&#8217;s just the way it is. isaac newton is to blame for this; not me. that is to say, since newton&#8217;s interpretation is demonstrating itself to be extremely likely, that means all opposing theories become extremely unlikely.</p>
<p>you said &#8220;Do not get the Second Coming as King of Kings and the taking of his Bride confused, they are separate events&#8221; but this is cannot possibly be true since the apostle clearly states both things occur at an event called &#8220;the parousia of the Lord&#8221;- 1thess4:15-17; 2thess2:8. so, speaking in context of newton&#8217;s predictions i can now safely say that the catching up will occur at the sept 23, 2015 point. which blows my mind even right now but the information cannot be rationally denied so my hand is forced.</p>
<p>i have to side note here that newton&#8217;s work had time-constrained the prophetic timeline so we are going to be seeing the king of confusion launching his attack with all his host on tevet 10 and that is really REALLY looking like what all this mayan 2012 hype is intended to do- herald the parousia of the son of perdition. believe me when i tell you he&#8217;s coming, and he is going to wipe the church off the face of the earth- only a remnant of christians will escape the spiritual assault and remain faithful to the true King of Israel. i see clearly now that the means of escape is knowledge of the times as prophetic appointments. everyone is being taught to expect a horrible physical calamity but it is all a horrible spiritual calamity- and the christians are in the crosshairs. do not let anyone deceive you by any means: if he doesn&#8217;t come on tishri 10 he is NOT our Rock.</p>
<p>Eph 6:11-13 read it; learn it; live it. 1Pet 4:12</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[james staten it&#039;s interesting you bring that up (the 2060 date) as i&#039;ve been looking into newton&#039;s works. it appears that newton did not intend the 2060 date to be regarded as a prediction at all. here is one link to an interesting article on the subject: http://www.isaac-newton.org/pdf/Snobelen%20Newton%202060%20CJH%202003%20hi%20res.pdf

newton also interpreted the 1,260 days as 1,260 years, and considered these the course of the papacy which would culminate alongside the 49 years. thus newton knew that if he could correctly establish when to start the count of the 1,260 days, he could also discover the time of the second coming through this information, since he believed the 1,260 years and the final 49 years would run concurrently and have the same terminal point. unfortunately, newton could never determine a precise date with which to begin the 1,260 year count. he considered multiple dates, and to these possible dates he simply added 1,260 years for a possible end date. Thus the figures such as 2034 and 2060 are to be understood as possible end dates based on the correct start date (which he could never satisfactorily determine for himself).

there was only one prediction that newton was certain of, and this was that when Jerusalem was returned to its old inhabitants, there would be 7 prophetic weeks until the second coming. 

in the article snobelen writes: On a single folio at the end of an early eighteenth-century manuscript treatise on the Apocalypse, Newton considers four commencement dates [of the start of the 1,260 years]: 609, 774, 788 and 841 A.D. The first date provides conclusion dates for the 1260, 1290 and 1335 years of 1869, 1899 and 1944. Newton appears to have been attracted to the 609 date because of the decree of Phocas in or around this year that granted Pope Boniface IV the right to &quot;set up the Images of the Virgin Mary and all the Martyrs in the place of the Images of Cybele and all the heathen Gods in the Pantheon at Rome and in their honour instituted the annual feast of all saints.&quot; Image worship was a major litmus test of apostasy. The commencement date 774 relates to the acquisition of temporal power by the Pope. Newton writes that it was in 774 that &quot;the Pope gained his temporal Estate dominion by the grant of Charles the great [Charlemagne] and thereby became a king and like ye rest of ye horns.&quot; The commencement date 774 provides a conclusion date of 2034 A.D., arguably more dramatic than the one publicized in early 2003.

now, of further interest is that, counting by 360-day cycles from a commencement date of 774 provides a conclusion date of 2015 (unless my math is off). if not, i would be EXTREMELY interested in knowing if i can pin down that 774 date to a specific day of the year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>james staten it&#8217;s interesting you bring that up (the 2060 date) as i&#8217;ve been looking into newton&#8217;s works. it appears that newton did not intend the 2060 date to be regarded as a prediction at all. here is one link to an interesting article on the subject: <a href="http://www.isaac-newton.org/pdf/Snobelen%20Newton%202060%20CJH%202003%20hi%20res.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.isaac-newton.org/pdf/Snobelen%20Newton%202060%20CJH%202003%20hi%20res.pdf</a></p>
<p>newton also interpreted the 1,260 days as 1,260 years, and considered these the course of the papacy which would culminate alongside the 49 years. thus newton knew that if he could correctly establish when to start the count of the 1,260 days, he could also discover the time of the second coming through this information, since he believed the 1,260 years and the final 49 years would run concurrently and have the same terminal point. unfortunately, newton could never determine a precise date with which to begin the 1,260 year count. he considered multiple dates, and to these possible dates he simply added 1,260 years for a possible end date. Thus the figures such as 2034 and 2060 are to be understood as possible end dates based on the correct start date (which he could never satisfactorily determine for himself).</p>
<p>there was only one prediction that newton was certain of, and this was that when Jerusalem was returned to its old inhabitants, there would be 7 prophetic weeks until the second coming. </p>
<p>in the article snobelen writes: On a single folio at the end of an early eighteenth-century manuscript treatise on the Apocalypse, Newton considers four commencement dates [of the start of the 1,260 years]: 609, 774, 788 and 841 A.D. The first date provides conclusion dates for the 1260, 1290 and 1335 years of 1869, 1899 and 1944. Newton appears to have been attracted to the 609 date because of the decree of Phocas in or around this year that granted Pope Boniface IV the right to &#8220;set up the Images of the Virgin Mary and all the Martyrs in the place of the Images of Cybele and all the heathen Gods in the Pantheon at Rome and in their honour instituted the annual feast of all saints.&#8221; Image worship was a major litmus test of apostasy. The commencement date 774 relates to the acquisition of temporal power by the Pope. Newton writes that it was in 774 that &#8220;the Pope gained his temporal Estate dominion by the grant of Charles the great [Charlemagne] and thereby became a king and like ye rest of ye horns.&#8221; The commencement date 774 provides a conclusion date of 2034 A.D., arguably more dramatic than the one publicized in early 2003.</p>
<p>now, of further interest is that, counting by 360-day cycles from a commencement date of 774 provides a conclusion date of 2015 (unless my math is off). if not, i would be EXTREMELY interested in knowing if i can pin down that 774 date to a specific day of the year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Staten</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>James Staten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philip Brewer, Brother It couldn&#039;t be said any better. Particularly your second response. From your lips to God&#039;s ear. Keep Looking Up, James Staten]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip Brewer, Brother It couldn&#8217;t be said any better. Particularly your second response. From your lips to God&#8217;s ear. Keep Looking Up, James Staten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also for the sake of clarity here since Newton&#039;s views are the topic of conversation. What Newton believed was that the 70 Weeks spelled out the first AND second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

He specifically thought that the 7 Week period referred to the Second Coming of our Lord (Which it does). Do not get the Second Coming as King of Kings and the taking of his Bride confused, they are separate events.

He (Newton) understood from Scripture that Israel would be gathered back into their land before the Second Coming (Isaiah 66:8-10). I have already shown that Ezekiel prophecied this thousands of years in advance. Israel is the Fig Tree (Hosea 9:10, Joel 1:7, Jeremiah 24, Matthew 24:32, Luke 21:29-30, Mark 13:28)

Grace and Peace be with you all!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also for the sake of clarity here since Newton&#8217;s views are the topic of conversation. What Newton believed was that the 70 Weeks spelled out the first AND second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>He specifically thought that the 7 Week period referred to the Second Coming of our Lord (Which it does). Do not get the Second Coming as King of Kings and the taking of his Bride confused, they are separate events.</p>
<p>He (Newton) understood from Scripture that Israel would be gathered back into their land before the Second Coming (Isaiah 66:8-10). I have already shown that Ezekiel prophecied this thousands of years in advance. Israel is the Fig Tree (Hosea 9:10, Joel 1:7, Jeremiah 24, Matthew 24:32, Luke 21:29-30, Mark 13:28)</p>
<p>Grace and Peace be with you all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The timeline I have shared is not &quot;mine&quot; by any means. We know that the Lord is not the author of confusion and as the Holy Scriptures tell us he cannot lie (Titus 1:2).

I am not talking about Jubilee periods, and you are correct that the end of the 49th Jubilee from the restoration of the Jewish people to their land will come to the Day of Atonement in 2015. What does that have to do with Daniel&#039;s Weeks?

The Lord, through his Holy Spirit, gave Daniel the Prophecy as he saw fit.....and as such one cannot argue that in order for the word to be fulfilled, and the count to be accurate it must start &quot;From the going forth of the commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem&quot;

That commandment in 1969 by the Israeli government could not have occurred had they not retaken those portions of land in the 6 day War. So yes, 1967 was prophetically significant and necessary for the commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem to go forth. Hence the Tetrad.

Let&#039;s not strive over foolish questions and splitting hairs (Titus 3:9). The point here is THIS: No matter if you are Pre Trib, Pre Wrath, Post Trib, whatever the TIME is AT HAND NOW!!!!!!!!!

Repent and Prepare the Way in Righteousness and Holiness, Preach the Gospel for the Glory of Lord! Offer to set the Captives free from their bondage with the free Gift of the Lord&#039;s Holy Spirit.

We must work the work he sent us to do while it is day; because the night is coming, when no man can work (John 9:4)

Grace and Peace be with all your Brothers! (&amp; Sisters)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The timeline I have shared is not &#8220;mine&#8221; by any means. We know that the Lord is not the author of confusion and as the Holy Scriptures tell us he cannot lie (Titus 1:2).</p>
<p>I am not talking about Jubilee periods, and you are correct that the end of the 49th Jubilee from the restoration of the Jewish people to their land will come to the Day of Atonement in 2015. What does that have to do with Daniel&#8217;s Weeks?</p>
<p>The Lord, through his Holy Spirit, gave Daniel the Prophecy as he saw fit&#8230;..and as such one cannot argue that in order for the word to be fulfilled, and the count to be accurate it must start &#8220;From the going forth of the commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem&#8221;</p>
<p>That commandment in 1969 by the Israeli government could not have occurred had they not retaken those portions of land in the 6 day War. So yes, 1967 was prophetically significant and necessary for the commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem to go forth. Hence the Tetrad.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not strive over foolish questions and splitting hairs (Titus 3:9). The point here is THIS: No matter if you are Pre Trib, Pre Wrath, Post Trib, whatever the TIME is AT HAND NOW!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Repent and Prepare the Way in Righteousness and Holiness, Preach the Gospel for the Glory of Lord! Offer to set the Captives free from their bondage with the free Gift of the Lord&#8217;s Holy Spirit.</p>
<p>We must work the work he sent us to do while it is day; because the night is coming, when no man can work (John 9:4)</p>
<p>Grace and Peace be with all your Brothers! (&amp; Sisters)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Staten</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>James Staten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t leave out Newton&#039;s prediction for the year 2060? .  http://philosophyofscienceportal.blogspot.com/2008/06/newton-and-2060.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t leave out Newton&#8217;s prediction for the year 2060? .  <a href="http://philosophyofscienceportal.blogspot.com/2008/06/newton-and-2060.html" rel="nofollow">http://philosophyofscienceportal.blogspot.com/2008/06/newton-and-2060.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[philip brewer i understand your interpretation and bear in mind i&#039;m certainly not saying you must factually be incorrect. what i am saying is this: i have your interpretation being given to me, and i also have newton&#039;s interpretation. now, newton is apparently predicting reality. newton predicts that israel would return from exile, perhaps not of themselves but by a kingdom friendly to them, preceding them; and that from the command to return jerusalem the final 7 sevens would run their course. now, newton specifically says, &quot;if there should go forth a command to return jerusalem to its old inhabitants, the truth will fully appear in seven weeks&quot;

okay so i see that israel has returned, not by their own hand, and jerusalem is returned to them. so i am now seeing that what newton predicted using the scripture is now reality. if i am looking for a &quot;command to return jerusalem to its old inhabitants&quot; then i see that clearly on june 7 this occurred and the command was given by one Moshe Dayan. Bear in mind you can say &quot;but i interpret this as a knesset command to begin rebuilding the old city&quot; but that is not what newton tells me, he says &quot;if a command should go forth to return jerusalem to its old inhabitants&quot; so i am saying, june 7 completely fulfils newton&#039;s prediction. the date is even marked by a an-naksa mourning by the palestinians. 

so while your interpretation could be the right one, it in fact has shown zero predictive power while newton&#039;s is demonstrating off-the-charts predictive power. that is why i must consider newton&#039;s interpretation as superior to yours; it is simply a matter of reason. it is not reasonable for me to put your interpretation in the same category as newton&#039;s since his words have factual predictive power.

this puts the second coming at either 2015-2016 depending on our count. as far as i am academically concerned, any other dates being set are all equally probable, all having the same sense of being untested hypotheses, as it were- while newton&#039;s interpretation has left hypothesis status, subjected to falsification, and demonstrated enormous predictive power: this is actually quite staggering as it appears that newton has, in fact, ran a three-hundred-year-long experiment and the scientific results are now in: newton has scientifically proven that God is sovereign, and the second coming is imminent. it&#039;s actually mind-blowing as i consider it.

now, add to this the fact that, biblically speaking, i already know that the second coming will occur on yom kippur. i&#039;ve known this for years. but i never though the actual year could be glimpsed. but if we count 49 360-day cycles we come out right on the very day Christ has to return (perhaps not the year- but we do in fact come out right on yom kippur). i add to this the information the three tetrads; and i note something apparently big is going to occur in 2014-2015.

so it goes:

Christ must return on yom kippur. bible fact.
newton predicts reality; a command to return jerusalem to its old inhabitants beginning a course of 7 prophetic weeks until the yom kippur second coming.
beginning june 7 counting 49 cycles of 360 ends on yom kippur.
in the middle of the final tetrad grouping alinging on the holy days.

newton is shooting the proverbial prophetic arrow straight and true along a perfect jubilee cycle to hit the bullseye of yom kippur in the midst of the final tetrad alignments. maybe nothing occurs, but at this point, it is beyond rational dispute that God is sovereign, and Christ will return on Sept 23, 2015. that is where the information leads.

please bear in mind i am not saying this is bible truth (except, the yom kippur part); your hypothesis may be correct but it is highly unlikely (though i do note the information you are transmitting as well- i do not simply cast it aside without a thought); remember that the reason i am coming to this conclusion is that newton is predicting reality; that means i MUST regard his interpretation as true, and yours as false, until your hypothesis demonstrates itself to be predicting reality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>philip brewer i understand your interpretation and bear in mind i&#8217;m certainly not saying you must factually be incorrect. what i am saying is this: i have your interpretation being given to me, and i also have newton&#8217;s interpretation. now, newton is apparently predicting reality. newton predicts that israel would return from exile, perhaps not of themselves but by a kingdom friendly to them, preceding them; and that from the command to return jerusalem the final 7 sevens would run their course. now, newton specifically says, &#8220;if there should go forth a command to return jerusalem to its old inhabitants, the truth will fully appear in seven weeks&#8221;</p>
<p>okay so i see that israel has returned, not by their own hand, and jerusalem is returned to them. so i am now seeing that what newton predicted using the scripture is now reality. if i am looking for a &#8220;command to return jerusalem to its old inhabitants&#8221; then i see that clearly on june 7 this occurred and the command was given by one Moshe Dayan. Bear in mind you can say &#8220;but i interpret this as a knesset command to begin rebuilding the old city&#8221; but that is not what newton tells me, he says &#8220;if a command should go forth to return jerusalem to its old inhabitants&#8221; so i am saying, june 7 completely fulfils newton&#8217;s prediction. the date is even marked by a an-naksa mourning by the palestinians. </p>
<p>so while your interpretation could be the right one, it in fact has shown zero predictive power while newton&#8217;s is demonstrating off-the-charts predictive power. that is why i must consider newton&#8217;s interpretation as superior to yours; it is simply a matter of reason. it is not reasonable for me to put your interpretation in the same category as newton&#8217;s since his words have factual predictive power.</p>
<p>this puts the second coming at either 2015-2016 depending on our count. as far as i am academically concerned, any other dates being set are all equally probable, all having the same sense of being untested hypotheses, as it were- while newton&#8217;s interpretation has left hypothesis status, subjected to falsification, and demonstrated enormous predictive power: this is actually quite staggering as it appears that newton has, in fact, ran a three-hundred-year-long experiment and the scientific results are now in: newton has scientifically proven that God is sovereign, and the second coming is imminent. it&#8217;s actually mind-blowing as i consider it.</p>
<p>now, add to this the fact that, biblically speaking, i already know that the second coming will occur on yom kippur. i&#8217;ve known this for years. but i never though the actual year could be glimpsed. but if we count 49 360-day cycles we come out right on the very day Christ has to return (perhaps not the year- but we do in fact come out right on yom kippur). i add to this the information the three tetrads; and i note something apparently big is going to occur in 2014-2015.</p>
<p>so it goes:</p>
<p>Christ must return on yom kippur. bible fact.<br />
newton predicts reality; a command to return jerusalem to its old inhabitants beginning a course of 7 prophetic weeks until the yom kippur second coming.<br />
beginning june 7 counting 49 cycles of 360 ends on yom kippur.<br />
in the middle of the final tetrad grouping alinging on the holy days.</p>
<p>newton is shooting the proverbial prophetic arrow straight and true along a perfect jubilee cycle to hit the bullseye of yom kippur in the midst of the final tetrad alignments. maybe nothing occurs, but at this point, it is beyond rational dispute that God is sovereign, and Christ will return on Sept 23, 2015. that is where the information leads.</p>
<p>please bear in mind i am not saying this is bible truth (except, the yom kippur part); your hypothesis may be correct but it is highly unlikely (though i do note the information you are transmitting as well- i do not simply cast it aside without a thought); remember that the reason i am coming to this conclusion is that newton is predicting reality; that means i MUST regard his interpretation as true, and yours as false, until your hypothesis demonstrates itself to be predicting reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Staten</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>James Staten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 20:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newton said &quot;About the time of the end, a body of men will be raised up who will will turn their attention to the prophecies, and insist upon their  &quot;LITERAL&quot; interpretation, in the midst of much clamor and opposition&quot;. Amazingly Newton admits that during his life time it wasn&#039;t the end.  Could it be that Daniel 12:4 which was the sealing up of the book until the time of the end wouldn&#039;t allow Newton to see. We are back to another &quot;mystery&quot; which is a secret in the mind of the Lord until he reveals it. Just as he revealed several mysteries to Paul about the Body of Christ and the Catching away of the Believers until it was time. I believe Newton was called the first Christian Zionist, that the Jews would literally return to the land just as the scriptures teach. I once had an &quot;Ole Pastor&quot; who said sometimes &quot;black ink of white paper means what it says&quot; Let&#039;s see Daniel a Jew writing about the Jews in Jerusalem in the last days. Could be a key to end time bible prophecy!!!    J Staten]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newton said &#8220;About the time of the end, a body of men will be raised up who will will turn their attention to the prophecies, and insist upon their  &#8220;LITERAL&#8221; interpretation, in the midst of much clamor and opposition&#8221;. Amazingly Newton admits that during his life time it wasn&#8217;t the end.  Could it be that Daniel 12:4 which was the sealing up of the book until the time of the end wouldn&#8217;t allow Newton to see. We are back to another &#8220;mystery&#8221; which is a secret in the mind of the Lord until he reveals it. Just as he revealed several mysteries to Paul about the Body of Christ and the Catching away of the Believers until it was time. I believe Newton was called the first Christian Zionist, that the Jews would literally return to the land just as the scriptures teach. I once had an &#8220;Ole Pastor&#8221; who said sometimes &#8220;black ink of white paper means what it says&#8221; Let&#8217;s see Daniel a Jew writing about the Jews in Jerusalem in the last days. Could be a key to end time bible prophecy!!!    J Staten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Staten</title>
		<link>http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638&#038;cpage=1#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>James Staten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logosapologia.org/?p=3638#comment-1745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cobb, You state that &quot;the confusion begins with well-meaning teachers misinterpreting the prophecies&quot;. Can you share the name of or a list of well-meaning teachers who you believe interpret the prophecies correctly? Thanks in Advance, J Staten]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cobb, You state that &#8220;the confusion begins with well-meaning teachers misinterpreting the prophecies&#8221;. Can you share the name of or a list of well-meaning teachers who you believe interpret the prophecies correctly? Thanks in Advance, J Staten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
